Nickname Files: The regular mail software program being used
by the instructor can be used to create a "nickname," which is a label
given to a list of addresses. (Some programs call this the "broadcast"
function.) For example, the instructor can type or paste in all the
electronic addresses of his or her students and create a nickname such
as "English 112." The addresses are then stored and when the instructor
wants to send to the whole class, he or she simply types "English 112"
on the recipient line and the message goes to all the students whose
addresses were originally entered. (Further instructions on creating
nicknames for Ohio State users are in Appendix
C.) While this is a quick and convenient way for the instructor
to communicate with the students, it does not allow the students to
communicate with each other. To overcome this disadvantage, the instructor
can serve as the receiving point and forward all messages back to the
nickname. Even when the instructor monitors the incoming mail steadily,
however, using the nickname arrangement for interactive exchange slows
down the process. The advantage is that using a nickname is perhaps
the easiest way to begin an exchange and is certainly the quickest if
a one-time, rather than whole-term, discussion is being undertaken.
Many instructors say that they started their first electronic discussion
with a nickname and went to other forms after they had some experience
with using the nickname function. They find that nicknames are more
suited to one-way communication.
Newsgroups: Similar to electronic bulletin boards, newsgroups
are files of postings that are accessed through a newserver computer.
The newsgroup is established by the instructor through the management
of the computer (See Appendix D for further information
on newsgroups at Ohio State) and students check for new postings or
make new postings by using newsreader software, which is installed on
the computer that they are using. Newsgroups are relatively easy to
use, but require that the student and teacher go outside their normal
electronic mail program to use. They also are public and thus even those
outside the class have access to the discussion. Nuisance comments can
result.
Listservers: Listservers use software that creates a shared
mail environment among a specified group of "subscribers." An instructor
can request that a listserver be set up from the computer management
(See Appendix E for Ohio State procedures).
A list name is assigned and the instructor can subscribe the students
or ask them to subscribe themselves by sending a subscription message.
Once this has been accomplished all subscribers can send messages to
the list name. These messages will be received in the regular mail box
of the other subscribers. The instructor can either actively moderate
the listserver discussion by first viewing the messages before they
are sent to subscribers or can have an open list in which all postings
automatically go to subscribers on the list. Listservers are a little
more complicated to establish and use than nickname files, but once
established, they are very convenient and they have useful functions
that can be accessed, such as archiving old messages for retrieval.
Web-Based Alternatives: Using certain kinds of conferencing
software, instructors can establish discussion environments on their
personal or course homepage on the World Wide Web. (These applications
are not yet routinely supported at Ohio State.) Students go to a certain
part of the page where they can enter a discussion that can take place
either in real time or delayed time. The process is more convenient
to both the faculty and student user, and other functions on the page,
such as readings or the course syllabus, can be accessed from the same
location.
Desktop Video or Audio Conferencing: Some web-based alternatives
also support desktop audio or video conferencing, and they can be used
without web applications as well. Since these programs work best with
very small groups and all of the participants must use a workstation
that has not only the software but additional hardware (a video camera
and/or microphone), these applications are currently not feasible for
course applications in which all of the participants must be seen and
heard. Also, the technology for these applications is prone to problems
and is still being improved. For one-way transmission, such as bringing
an expert opinion to the group without the expert seeing the group,
or perhaps small group work, desktop video conferencing offers more
advantages than it presently does for whole class discussion.