Teaching staff at Ohio State have a lot of questions about policies and procedures about teaching. Unfortunately, the answers tend to be scattered all across our university. Whether you are new to Ohio State or have been teaching here for years, we hope this FAQ list provides location to find some quick answers to your questions. Have a question we haven’t asked yet? Please send it to us at ftad@osu.edu.
"A," "A-"
The instructor judged the student to have satisfied the stated
objectives of the course in an excellent manner. The student's
performance was judged to be in this range of high quality based
upon a comparison with other students in the course, and/or with
students who have taken the course previously, and/or the instructor's
personal expectations relative to the stated objectives of the
course, based on the instructor's experience and expertise.
"B+," "B," "B-"
The instructor judged the student to have satisfied the stated
objectives of the course in an above-average manner. The student's
performance was judged to be in this range of above-average quality
based upon a comparison with other students in the course, and/or
with students who have taken the course previously, and/or the
instructor's personal expectations relative to the stated objectives
of the course, based on the instructor's experience and expertise.
"C+," "C," "C-"
The instructor judged the student to have satisfied the stated
objectives of the course in an average manner. The student's performance
was judged to be in this range of average quality based upon a
comparison with other students in the course, and/or students
who have taken the course previously, and/or the instructor's
personal expectations relative to the stated objectives of the
course, based on the instructor's experience and expertise
"D+," "D"
The instructor judged the student to have satisfied the stated
objectives of the course in a low but acceptable manner. The student's
performance was judged to be in this range of below average but
acceptable quality based upon a comparison with other students
in the course, and/or with students who have taken the course
previously, and/or the instructor's personal expectations relative
to the stated objectives of the course, based on the instructor's
experience and expertise.
"E"
The instructor judged the student not to have satisfied the stated
objectives of the course. Credit for a course in which the mark
"E" has been received can be obtained only by repeating and passing
the course in class (see rules 3335-8-23 to 3335-8-28 of the Administrative
Code).
"EM" - examination
This mark indicates credit given to students registered in the
university on the basis of examinations taken prior to or after
admission to the university. The level of achievement which must
be demonstrated by the student on these examinations in order
to receive "EM" credit shall be determined by the department or
school in which the course is offered for credit, in accord with
the criteria for the award of letter grades. This credit, up to
a maximum of forty-five credit hours, shall be assigned only upon
the authorization of the chair of the department or the director
of the school and with the approval of the authorized representative
of the dean or director of the student's enrollment unit. Additional
examination credit hours may be assigned specific curricular programs
with the prior approval of the council on academic affairs. Examination
credit shall not be given to a student for a course in which the
student has received a mark at this university or for which the
student has transfer credit from some other college or university.
Conversely, no course for which "EM" credit has been received
can be taken later for a grade or credit. No credit points are
allowed for courses in which a mark of "EM" is given.
"I" - incomplete
An "I" indicates that the student has completed a major portion
of the work in the course in a satisfactory manner, but for reasons
judged by the instructor to be legitimate, a portion of the course
requirements remains to be completed.
"K" - credit
This mark shall be used for work credited from other institutions
by the director of undergraduate admissions only. "K" credit shall
be counted as hours only and shall not be considered in determining
a student's point-hour ratio under rule 3335-8-26 of the Administrative
Code.
"EN" - E, non-attendance
This mark shall be used to indicate that the student was properly
registered for the course, but failed to complete the course because
of non-attendance. It does not differentiate between the student
who never attended or stopped attending at some point during the
academic term. When assigning this mark, an instructor must also
provide some indication (e.g. day or week of the academic term)
of when the student stopped attending the course. This mark shall
be treated as an "E" for the purpose of calculating a student's
point-hour ratio.
"P" - progress
This mark is used to indicate that the student has shown satisfactory
progress in a series or sequence of courses where the mark is
not recorded until the final quarter, semester, or session of
the series or sequence is completed. Until such time as a final
mark is recorded, the mark of "P" shall be given and the credit
shall be counted as hours only, and shall not be considered in
determining a student's point-hour ratio under rule 3335-8-26
of the Administrative Code. When a final mark is submitted by
the instructor, all previous "P" marks shall assume and be recorded
with the value of this final mark.
"PA" - pass, "NP" - non-pass
The grade pass "PA" means the student has satisfied the stated
objectives of the course, and the grade non-pass "NP" is the equivalent
of the grade "E." These marks may be used at the option of undergraduate
or continuing education students only, subject to the following
conditions:
"S" - satisfactory, "U" - unsatisfactory
An "EN" (E, non-attendance) mark shall be used to indicate that
a student was properly registered for the course, but failed to
complete the course because of non-attendance. It does not differentiate
between the student who never attended or stopped attending at
some point during the academic term. When assigning this mark,
an instructor must also provide some indication (e.g. day or week
of the academic term) of when the student stopped attending the
course. This mark shall be treated as an "E" for the purpose of
calculating a student's point-hour ratio.
Rules of the University Faculty 3335-8-21
Individuals in positions of power must be aware that romantic or sexual relationships with students are fraught with danger for exploitation and pose a legal risk to both the individual and the institution. There are special risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions of power. These relationships may be subject to concerns about the validity of consent and unfair treatment of other students or employees. Such relationships can undermine the atmosphere of trust essential to the educational process and the employment relationship. They may, moreover, be less consensual than the individual whose position confers power believes. The apparent consensual nature of the relationship is inherently suspect due to the fundamental asymmetry of power in the relationship and it thus may be difficult to establish consent as a defense to a charge. Even when both parties consented at the outset to a romantic or sexual involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for or preclude a charge or subsequent finding of sexual harassment based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct. The greater the institutional power differential that exists the greater risk there is for exploited consent. Exploited consent exists when consent to a relationship is given as a function of the position of power one occupies over another within an institution. Many international students, faculty, and staff come from cultures in which deference to any authority figure is important and sexual harassment laws do not exist. Some individuals may be especially vulnerable to exploitive relationships given cultural, language, and immigration/visa issues. Faculty, staff, and students should be very careful to avoid relationships that may be exploitive in nature.
FERPA protects the privacy of students' education records by setting forth strict instructions and limitations governing the release of information about students. Although FERPA contains exceptions for the release of "directory information" without a student's prior written consent, students have the right to request that even such directory information be withheld from disclosure to third parties.
Given the restrictions of FERPA, you should assume that all of your students must provide written consent that follows the format specified in FERPA before any education records may be released to anyone other than the student. Information cannot be released to any third party, including the students' parents, relatives, and friends. Particularly sensitive information includes students' social security numbers, race or ethnicity, gender, nationality, academic performance, disciplinary records, and grades.
If parents do request such information, you should assume that the student is not a dependent student and explain that you cannot discuss the student's academic performance without written permission of the student. Grades, classroom performance, quiz and test scores, and exams are all part of the student's education record and require written permission to divulge to parents. Student authorization must detail exactly what information can be released to the parents and should be in writing signed by the student.
If the student wishes to comment on the allegations of academic misconduct during this meeting, he/she should be permitted to do so. You can include in your report to the Committee any comments that the student makes. However, the primary purpose of the meeting between you and the student is to inform the student of the allegation of academic misconduct; you should not interrogate the student.
The Committee on Academic Misconduct recommends that you inform a student of an allegation of academic misconduct before submitting the allegation to the Committee. However, the Committee also realizes that it is sometimes difficult to contact students, especially if the student has completed the course, project, or activity in which the misconduct allegedly occurred, so the meeting with a student is not mandatory. The Committee on Academic Misconduct will accept and adjudicate cases of alleged academic misconduct even if this preliminary meeting between student and instructor is not held.
In cases involving alleged academic misconduct by a graduate student, consultation with the chairperson of the student's graduate program and/or the Graduate School might be warranted prior to contacting the student or COAM.
Students often want to know how an allegation of academic misconduct will affect their enrollment or grade in a course. Thus, for allegations related to a course, you should tell the student that (1) he/she is permitted to continue in the course without prejudice and (2) his/her final grade will be determined after the allegations of academic misconduct are adjudicated.
Go to the Committee
on Academic Misconduct (COAM) web site (Link
opens new window) for more information.
Reprinted with permission from COAM
When submitting this information, please remember that:
All cases submitted to the Committee on Academic Misconduct should
be accompanied by a letter from the department chairperson or
program director (or other appropriate administrative officer).
These materials should be sent to the Committee in a way that
maintains confidentiality. COAM has prepared a template that provides
step-by-step instructions for (1) what to report and (2) how to
report it. Go to http://oaa.osu.edu/coam/template.html
Send materials to:
Committee on Academic Misconduct
33 W. 11th Avenue, Room 107
CAMPUS
Go to the Committee
on Academic Misconduct (COAM) web site (Link
opens new window) for more information.
Reprinted with permission from COAM
3. Who is responsible for determining appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities?