Instructor of Record | Instructional Team | Seminar | Studio | Clinical | One-on-One | Course/TA Supervisor | Knowing Your Audience
The typical seminar, for either graduate or undergraduate students, involves
a great deal of classroom discussion and critique about scholarly readings,
and one final
"publishable" research paper on an aspect of that seminar
topic. Edward Neal (1996) suggests that there are several problems with this model. Instructors
may expect students to "find their own way," and therefore, little planning for the seminar is necessary.
This approach can lead to class discussions in which students find it difficult to
identify the important points they should be getting out of the seminar process. Students may also
find it difficult to select a topic for their research papers and
may subsequently
wait until it is very late in the academic term to start writing, leading
to incomplete
or poor work.
For planning a seminar, Neal (1996) offers the following questions to help create a
positive learning experience:
When planning how to lead seminars, consider replacing large research papers with a series of smaller research activities that would provide experiences replicating a complete project. This would be especially helpful when teaching an undergraduate seminar. Also consider the use of cooperative learning activities, allowing students to help decide on the focus for the seminar, and asking students to collaboratively author papers with their classmates.