Begin OSU masthead and toolbar


READ | TEACHING @ | COURSE PREPARATION

Universal Design | Course Content | Course Goals | Structuring an Effective Course | Selecting Learning Activities | The Syllabus

Structuring an Effective Course

In Teaching Assistance: A Handbook of Teaching Ideas (1982), John Andrews suggests that a teacher should use the following questions as a means of planning an effective course. These points should enable the instructor to see how goals can shape planning for other aspects of the class. Note that the questions focus at the end point first and then work backward in time to the first action the teacher will take:

  1. How does the teacher want students to be changed as a result of this class? What should they be able to do that they cannot do now?
  2. How are these changes to be measured? What sort of performances (exams, papers, etc.) will be used?
  3. What subject matter will be covered to help students meet the expectations in (1) and (2)?
  4. What about the “how” of teaching? What sorts of formats or activities will be used to help students practice the abilities needed to meet (1) and (2)?
  5. How are expectations communicated to the students? What is their picture of the objectives they will need to meet?

Mary Minter of the University of Michigan (1986) has suggested a more detailed planning analysis for an instructor faced with a new course if such an expectation exists. She suggests that on accepting the course assignment, well-prepared instructors first set out to acquire as much information as possible about the students they will be teaching (see the first section of this handbook) and the content they will be expected to cover in the course, if such an expectation exists. Resources to consult include the college catalog, previous syllabi, the official department course description, and the assigned textbook. Instructors can also solicit help from anyone who has previously taught the course.

Minter regards the next step as the setting of general goals and specific instructional objectives for the course. Instructors might be able to use a general purpose statement given on a previous syllabus, and/or they might want to include different or additional goals. The next step is to provide the student with even more specific instructional objectives, which should relate to the overall goals and be specific to the major content sections/topics. “Action verbs” that are specific, such as: “list, write, report, do” are highly recommended. The final step is to conduct another level of task analysis. Students’ basic learning needs in the subject area should be identified. (This can be based, for example, on past experience with similar groups of students or on a personal questionnaire that students complete on the first day.) From all this analysis an effective course structure will evolve.

Grunert (1997) stresses the importance of a “learning-centered” approach to course planning. She suggests that students should be involved in course planning through clarifying their own goals for the course, helping choose learning activities, monitoring and assessing their progress, and assisting in establishing the criteria on which performance will be judged. Some instructors use portions of the first class to modify or build upon their own plans for the course by asking for student participation and suggestions.

previous previous page