learning | motivation | differences
Cognitive psychologists also emphasize the internal motivation of the learner (as opposed to external stimuli) and the role of social communities in learning. Theorists such as Pintrich (1994) and Perry, Menec, and Struthers (1996) point out that motivation is affected by both student and classroom factors. Students' beliefs about whether they are in control and competent to perform a learning task as well as the nature of the tasks, the reward and goal structure, the instructional methods, and teacher expectations and behaviors can affect learning. They suggest that teachers help students use "effort" as an explanation for their learning results rather than "luck," and teachers provide variety, an appropriate level of challenge, a collaborative rather than competitive ethos, and sufficient organizational structure for learning. Wlodkowski and Ginsberg (1995) focus on student diversity in discussing motivation. They argue that students at the margins have particularly high needs for support. They suggest that teachers work hard to establish a sense of inclusion so that students feel respected and connected to one another; that they use relevance and choice to create a sense of self-determination; that they engage and challenge students to enhance meaning; and that they create a sense of competence in their students. Also focusing on instructor actions and classroom climate, McLeod (1996) distinguishes between "deep learning states" and surface learning, emphasizing that low stress learning environments that promote interpersonal interaction and create an atmosphere of caring and open reflection are more likely to foster deep learning.
Effective teachers realize that teaching is more than simply "laying out the feast of knowledge" and hoping that students will be motivated enough to partake. Teachers can have significant impact on levels of student motivation through exciting interest and encouraging learning as well as in introducing information. Instructors who excel in inspiring students argue that creating a good classroom environment for learning is fundamental to their success. James Knight, a former Ohio State faculty member, lists nine tips for improving the classroom climate:
Integral to any discussion of motivation is "personalizing" the classroom. Using instructional strategies that enable some individualization of instruction or small group work helps develop personal investment and interest in learning. Similarly, direct attempts of instructors to talk about such things as their own life experiences related to the subject and their personal difficulties in mastering certain concepts create a warmer classroom climate.
As discussed earlier, Ohio State students come from a variety of backgrounds. It would be appropriate to assume that they would also have a variety of motivations for learning and widely differing levels of motivation. Even if students are willing to work hard and learn while in school or are capable of doing good work, there are external factors that may inhibit them from succeeding.
Likewise, students enroll in specific classes for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to a deep passion for the subject, teacher reputation, a pedestrian interest in the subject matter, requirements for majors and graduation, parents' insistence, and scheduling limitations that necessitate that they take any class at that time. In addition, some students come with a strong desire to succeed and a network of family and friends who are constantly supporting and encouraging them. Others may be the first in their family to go to college, and thus are here without the sense of tradition or their family's understanding of the difficulty and of the life-changing processes of the new experience. This type of motivation and support, in particular, has a profound effect on student dedication and success.